This was one of the books I chose last year for my TBR Challenge, and since it's a neo-Victorian, I thought it would fit in very well with the Victorian Celebration. Well, yes and no. It's set in the Victorian era, though it was written 100 years later, in 1969, and even though Fowles does a very good job of writing in the Victorian style, it's definitely a modern novel, or post-modern one. In other words, it's very meta and the ending just confused the heck out of me.
I suppose I'm getting ahead of myself. Ostensibly, this is the story of a love triangle between Charles Smithson, an idle gentlemen in his early thirties, the heir apparent to a title and grand estates; his fiancee Ernestina, the sweet but spoiled only daughter of a rich tradesman; and the eponymous French Lieutenant's Woman, Sarah Woodruff (the French Lieutenant himself is only mentioned in passing, so don't worry about him). Ernestina is staying with her aunt in Lyme a few months before her marriage to Charles, and he's come down to Lyme to visit her and poke around looking for fossils (the same ones discussed at length in Remarkable Creatures by Tracy Chevalier, which I read several months ago).
One day while Charles and Ernestina are out walking out on the famous Cobb, Charles sees a beautiful and mysterious woman, staring at the sea. She's a local eccentric known as the French Lieutenant's Woman -- apparently the Lieutenant was a shipwreck survivor and she fell in love with him while nursing him back to health. She had planned to run off with him, but instead he left without her and ruined her reputation. Sarah is employed as a companion by a nasty and pious rich woman who likes to torture the less fortunate, and she's forbidden to go out walking to the sea or the woods, but she defies her mistress and keeps running into Charles. Charles then becomes obsessed with her, which complicates his engagement, as you can well imagine.
This story starts out as a fairly straightforward Victorian melodrama, but after a few chapters, it becomes apparent that it's more than that. The omniscient narrator becomes more and more involved in the story, addressing the reader directly and reminding us that this is a modern book, with references to the present day and how Victorians were so different, unable to imagine television and computers and whatnot. He starts putting in witty asides and footnotes and whole histories of other people, to try and show us how the Victorian mind worked and how different things are in the present (that is, the late 1960s).
|The famous Cobb at Lyme Regis|
I liked this book but at some points I did get very annoyed by the narrator, who seemed rather smug and condescending to the reader. I assume Charles' attraction to Sarah was supposed to symbolize the break with traditional repressive Victorian society and desire for freedom. (He's also a lazy snob, and I don't think he's ever worked a day in his life.)
One thing that really bothered me was I found the novel extremely sexist -- nearly all the female characters were either manipulative, gold-diggers or looking for husbands, with the exception of Ernestina's aunt who seemed genuinely kind. There's a lot of discussion about hysterical females which I found really off-putting -- I'm sure Fowles is trying to show how modern he is, but since it was written during the late 1960s, during the women's movement, I can't help but wonder if he's taking shots at feminism.
Also, I found the ending rather confusing. I guess post-modern meta-fiction is just not my thing. Still, overall I liked this book, though I wasn't what I expected at all. I'd seen the movie years ago but I barely remembered anything about it, which I suppose is a good thing.
I read this because The Magus by Fowles is one of my favorite books of all time. I didn't enjoy this one as much as The Magus but still it's a worthy read. The ending confused me too but it all became clear when I saw the film. Do watch it if you can find it.ReplyDelete
Having read this, I think I'm afraid to read The Magus! I'll have to look for the film, I think they have it at the library where I work. I wonder if I'll like it better than the book.Delete
I tried to read this a few years ago and could NOT handle the narrator. I wanted to punch him in the gut.ReplyDelete
OK, that made me laugh out loud! He did get really obnoxious, didn't he?Delete
I've wondered about this book for years. After reading your excellent review, I'm still wondering whether or not it's for me. The narrator might drive me crazy, lol!ReplyDelete
Thanks! Overall, I did enjoy it, but it was not what I expected at all. I'd never read Fowles so I didn't know it would be post-modern and meta.Delete
I read this ages ago, and remember feeling similarly confused. It's one of those books that I read, filed, and didn't really think about again. I know it was a sensation in 1969, but it doesn't sound like it's stood the test of time. Thanks for your review!ReplyDelete
I'm not really into post-modern fiction so I think a lot of the literary aspects are probably lost on me -- I really just read it because I'm so into the Victorians. I was mostly attracted to the Victorian setting.Delete
He was one of my favorite authors, and I loved the movie as well.ReplyDelete
Which book was your favorite? I've only read this one. I tried The Collector years ago but couldn't get into it.ReplyDelete
I agree with you on that one. I read it some time ago and I wasn't satisfied either with the condescending tone or with the dubious ending. I wondered why Fowles didn't want to grant Sarah a HEA - because he liked torturing her as well or because he thought it impossible for that era?ReplyDelete
I had to think hard about what HEA was -- happily ever after, right? I think he just wanted to torture her.Delete
This book has sat on my shelf, unread for about 30 years. It's one of my sister's favorite books, but since her favorite author is Thomas Hardy, you can imagine my hesitation. :)ReplyDelete
Now that you've reviewed it, I''m curious as to how I will like it.
I've read two books by Hardy so far and I'm not feeling the love. However, a good friend swears by The Return of the Native, so I'm going to give him one more try.Delete
I liked parts of this book, but the narrator got so annoying.
I wanted to love Return of the Native, but couldn't as I found both main characters to be incredibly irritating. There are some great scenes though, especially the opening with the bonfires lighting the countryside.Delete
Hello there and how are you? I hope you are well. I tagged you for the Liebster Blog Award; I hope you don't mind. Have a good day!ReplyDelete
Your reviews are great! Keep up the good work!